Wednesday, September 3, 2008

September 10th - CERN switch on LHC

On September 10th, CERN will switch on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
and in the process begin arguably the most ambitious science experiment ever undertaken.

Radio 4 has a great web resource and a dozen or so radio programmes around the 10th September. Also a Radio and Video interviews archive with:-
Brian Cox
Adam Hart-Davis
Ben Miller
Dara O'Briain
Simon Singh
Steve Punt.
Enjoy!!

Professor Brian Cox answers questions


Questions and Answers

Professor Brian Cox answers questions sent in by the audience about CERN's new Large Hadron Collider and the major experiment which is planned to be launched on the 10 september 2008. Do you have a question? Ask expert Brian Cox anything about the project and read his responses to other questions.

  • QWhy experiment at all?
    Can you tell me why we are doing this experiment? I can understand that you are hoping to reveal the origins of mass by smashing tiny particles together but what advantages (besides increase in knowledge), do you expect to obtain from this?
    Stephen
  • A Experiment is the basis of the scientific method, without which there would be no modern world as we know it. The quest to understand the smallest building blocks of nature and the forces that hold them together arguably began with the ancient Greeks, but it was only when we began to conduct experiments that we discovered the electron (1897), quantum mechanics (triggered by precision observations of the light emitted by elements when heated), X-rays, the atomic nucleus, radioactive decay ..... the list is practically endless. Without these experimental discoveries, and the subsequent deepening of our understanding of the Universe, there would be no electronics, no silicon chips or transistors, no medical imaging technology, no nuclear power stations, no X-rays or chemotherapy treatments for cancer .... again an almost endless list. What this should teach us is two things. First, it is virtually impossible to deepen our understanding of nature without experiments. Second, understanding nature has never been a bad idea - indeed without the pioneers of the past century our civilisation would be immeasurably poorer. I do not know what the continuation of this long and illustrious quest will lead to, but I would be extremely surprised if a writer called upon to defend scientific enquiry at the turn of the 22nd century does not point to the LHC as the foundation of a hundred new technologies, each considered essential to our quality of life.
    BC.
  • Q Existence of Multi-Dimensions
    Will the Collider be able to prove to scientists that many other dimensions exist as well as ours? If so, then what will the implications be for our future, and could this be a good explanation for the many UFO sightings around the world.
    Ian
  • AThe LHC could indeed provide strong evidence for the existence of extra dimensions in our Universe. The fact that they are so hard to see (if they exist), however, means that our world interacts with them very weakly. In fact, we theorize that if they do exist, the force of gravity is the only influence that can pass between them. This would prevent any material objects from crossing from one set of dimensions to another. So no, UFO enthusiasts must look elsewhere.
    BC
  • Q Understanding Dark Matter
    Will the LHC help our understanding of Dark Matter (which seems to make up most of the Universe) and Dark Energy (which seems to be accelerating the expansion of the Universe)? Are these phenomena 'real' or just a result of our misinterpreting measurements of distance and mass for far away objects
    Russell
  • AQuite possibly, yes, certainly for the case of dark matter. One of the most popular interpretations of the evidence that points to the existence of dark matter is that there are new, as yet undiscovered heavy particles in the Universe that interact with normal matter only via the weak nuclear force and gravity. In particle physics, we have a family of theoretical candidates for such particles known as Supersymmetric particles. If these exist, then many theoretical physicists expect them to be made and discovered at the LHC. Dark energy is another mater, because we have very little theoretical understanding of this phenomena at present. It may just be that if we get some evidence of extra dimensions at the LHC, which may point the way to a deeper understanding of gravity (a "quantum theory of gravity" along the lines of string theory perhaps), then we may gain some insight into this fascinating discovery.

    And yes, you are correct that these phenomena may be due to a mis-undertstanding of something - perhaps the theory of gravity itself at very large distance scales. I think the experimental evidence that something is missing in our understanding is very strong now, however, and its not merely an experimental error. .
    BC
  • Q Multiple Big Bangs
    What are the possibilities of multiple Big Bangs creating multiple parallel universes?
    Jon
  • AIf you're asking about the mini-big bangs at the LHC, then the chances are zero. It's a bit of a misnomer actually to call the collisions mini Big Bangs - each one has the energy of a mosquito hitting you in the face on a summers day, albeit confined to a very small space!

    But - and this has little to do with LH directly - some of the current theories of the origin of our Universe suggest that in fact the Universe has been around for ever. What we see as the big bang was simply something happening to our little piece of spacetime 13.7 billion years ago. There could be multiple "sheets" of spacetime (sometimes called "branes" floating around in an infinitely large multi-dimensional Universe, with everything we see being confined to just one. When these sheets bump into each other, they become very hot and expand, so to anyone living on a sheet today it would look like their Universe began at the point of collision.
    BC
  • Q Black Holes and matter
    If you are able to generate even small Black Holes, will they suck up matter? Do full sized Black Holes draw in invisible matter also? You have an exciting project and I wish you a lot of luck in the operation of your new hardware.
    Merlin
  • AIt's just possible that we could create mini black holes, although this would require at least that there are extra dimensions in our Universe, for which we have no evidence ! If, however, we did, then the little black holes would bear no relation at all to the Black Holes created when stars collapse. They would evaporate away very quickly via a process called Hawking radiation (unless we have no understanding at all of quantum theory). Even if they don't, they would be so very tiny that matter would never get close enough to them to be sucked in! Big black holes do suck matter in, and should also emit Hawking radiation, although they emit it much more slowly and so live for a very long time (much more than the current age of the Universe).
    BC
  • Q Applications to everyday life
    In terms off what this could achieve for the humanity in the next 20-30 years. Can this technology change our everyday lives within our lifetimes? Or do you see humanity waiting a little more patiently before our lives are transformed with wormholes and quantum computing?
    Lawrence
  • AI wish I knew! Let me give one positive example from history. Quantum mechanics was developed to maturity as a theory during the 1920s and by 1947 we had the first transistor. It is often said, I think with some justification, that it is extremely unlikely that transistors could have been developed without the quantum theory. Perhaps we are on the verge of a similar leap when we deepen our understanding of the sub-atomic world once again at LHC - who knows!
    BC
  • Q New forms of fuel?
    Do you think that there is a chance of discovering a new fuel source or better ways to create/manage energy during this experiment? I imagine enormous amounts of energy coming out of it...
    Dave
  • ANo energy comes out of LHC - we get out of every collision exactly what we put in. I think the best hope for LHC technology helping us with the energy crisis is that the cooling systems developed for LHC are now being transfered to the ITER fusion project in France. And fusion certainly would be the answer to our energy problems if we can make it work on an industrial scale, which is the goal of ITER by around 2035.
    BC
  • Q What if the Higgs Boson particle is found?
    I also understand that the purpose of the LHC is to find the elusive God particle. If this was found, what would be the implications for science as we know it, and what would the next steps be?
    Darren
  • AThe Higgs particle is one of our theoretical explanations for the origin lf mass in the Universe. If found, therefore, we will understand what mass is! This is the place where we are "stuck" at the moment in our theories, and answering this question will we suspect provide a door to a deeper understanding of the Universe. If the Higgs theory is wrong, by the way, then we will see whatever it is that is responsible for generating mass - it doesn't HAVE to be a Higgs particle! The implications are quite profound because this is the point at which our current best theory of reality, the Standard Model, breaks down. We have been stuck here for several decades, so the LHC is guaranteed to be a giant leap forwrad whatever we find there.
    BC
  • Q What if there is no Higgs Boson?
    What will it mean if the Higgs Boson and other particles are not detected by the LHC?
    Alex
  • ASee above ! It will be more exciting in many ways because it will mean that we have understood much less than we thought about nature.
    BC
  • Q Can bacteria survive?
    Would it be possible to put various simple bacteria into the experiment to see if it survives. We are relatively certain that plant RNA probably evolved during the big bang. Animal DNA on the other hand could not and possibly came from meteorites carrying bacteria from other worlds (Panspermia theory). It would put this idea to bed if it couldn't survive the big bang.
    Mick
  • AIt won't! At the temperatures we generate in the collisions at LHC even protons and neutrons don't survive, never mind atoms and molecules.
    BC
  • Q Safety Concerns
    CERN have been confident in the prediction that there are no major risks associated with the LHC's operation. How robust is this prediction? In particular, how reliant is it upon unsupported theoretical assumptions?
    Chris

    I have heard that there is a very small possibility that this experiment could go wrong and create a black hole that could be catastrophic, is this actually possible?
    Chris

    Okay, so how do we know this thing won't make planet Earth implode then?
    Stephen

    Why would scientists want to risk the planet in this way? It is of course fascinating to want to know how the big bang worked but what is the point if our world was destroyed? Nobody will be around to find out the answer or if the experiment was successful or not. I am not being alarmist I just think that any risk is a risk too much. I and my precious family wish to be around on this beautiful planet for a long while.
    Pam
  • ALet me answer all of these at once.

    The LHC has absolutely no chance of destroying anything bigger than a few protons, let alone the Earth. This is not based on theoretical assumptions.

    It is, of course, essential that all scientific research at the frontiers of knowledge, from genetics to particle physics, is subjected to the most rigorous scrutiny to ensure that our voyages into the unknown do not result in unforeseen, perhaps dangerous outcomes. CERN, and indeed all research establishments, do this routinely and to the satisfaction of their host governments. In the case of the LHC, a report in plain English is available here:

    http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html

    For the record, the LHC collides particles together at energies far below those naturally occurring in many places in the Universe, including the upper atmosphere of our planet every second of every day. If the LHC can produce micro black holes, for example, then nature is doing it right now by smashing ultra-high energy cosmic ray particles into the Earth directly above our heads with no discernable consequences. The overwhelmingly most likely explanation for our continued existence in the face of this potentially prolific production of black holes is that they aren’t produced at all because there are either no extra dimensions in the Universe, or they aren’t set up right for us to see them. If black holes are being produced, then next on the list of explanations for our continued existence is the broad theoretical consensus that sub-atomic black holes should fizzle back into the Universe very quickly billionths of a second after they are created in a little flash of particles via a process known as Hawking radiation. In other words they evaporate away very quickly indeed. This process, which is perhaps Steven Hawking’s greatest contribution to theoretical physics, is on significantly firmer theoretical ground than the extra dimensions theories required to create the little black holes in the first place. Even if Hawking is wrong, and therefore much of our understanding of modern physics is also wrong, the little black holes would be so tiny that they would rarely come close enough to a particle of matter in the Earth to eat it and grow. And even if you don’t buy any of this, then you can still relax in the knowledge that we have no evidence anywhere in the Universe of a little black hole eating anything – not just Earth but the Sun and planets and every star we can see in the sky including the immensely dense neutron stars and white dwarfs, remnants of ancient Suns that populate the sky in their millions and which because of their density would make great black hole food.

    So - the only theoretical bit is in the proposition that you can make little black holes in the first place. From then on, observation tells us that these things either (a) don't exist - the most likely explanation, or (b) exist but do not eat neutron stars and are therefore harmless, probably because they evaporate away very quickly indeed!

    I am in fact immensely irritated by the conspiracy theorists who spread this nonsense around and try to scare people. This non-story is symptomatic of a larger mistrust in science, particularly in the US, which includes intelligent design amongst other things. The only serious issue is why so many people who don't have the time or inclination to discover for themselves why this stuff is total crap have to be exposed to the opinions of these half-wits.
    BC
  • Q The Original Big Bang
    May I ask, how do you know that there was a "Big Bang" in the first place, surely it's all just guess work and speculation.
    Andrew

    What instigated that first big bang? Surely there need be something to have caused it? Is it a cop out to say that first cause is transcendent or just the best possible answer?
    Christopher

    I watched a program with Stephen Hawkins and he said that before the "Big Bang" there was nothing, if there was nothing, then where did everything come from...?
    Andrew
  • A See above for a discussion of possible alternative theories for theBig Bang.
    BC
  • Sunday, August 10, 2008

    World's most powerful accelerator set to switch on - 10th September

    • 23:03 07 August 2008
    • NewScientist.com news service
    • Matthew Chalmers

    Three decades after its conception, half as long in construction, and several years behind schedule, the switch will finally be flicked on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN in Geneva, on 10 September.

    Once up and running, the $10 billion machine will be world's most powerful particle collider, smashing protons into each other at an energy seven times higher than that of the Tevatron collider in the US. Physicists will then be in uncharted territory, hunting for new particles that could overturn their theories about nature's most fundamental laws.

    The main reason for announcing the start-up date almost five weeks in advance is to give the thousands of physicists working on the LHC's four giant particle detectors time to prepare. "This will focus the minds of all concerned to respect the date announced," LHC project leader Lyn Evans told New Scientist.

    It has taken six months and hundreds of tonnes of scarce liquid helium just to cool the superconducting magnets that will bend the protons around the 27-kilometre-ring to their operating temperature. Once all 1600 are sitting comfortably at -271 °Celsius, in the next week or two, around 1400 electrical tests will be carried out to make sure that everything is wired up correctly.

    This weekend, the operations team will test the injection of protons into one of the LHC ring's eight sectors. This involves using a pulsed magnet to "kick" bunches of protons out of a smaller accelerator called SPS and down a 'transfer line' into the LHC. The procedure is tricky because the pulses and bunches must coincide to within a fraction of a millisecond.

    Come 10 September, when the warren of caverns and tunnels has been checked out and sealed off – using high-security, iris-scanning locks, the first protons will be whipped up to nearly the speed of light through a chain of smaller accelerators on the CERN site. Then they will be injected into one of the LHC's two adjacent beam-pipes at an energy of 0.45 trillion electron volts (TeV).

    Course correction

    The protons might get just a few tens of metres into their 27-km circuit before veering off course and being lost, so the operations team will adjust the magnets and try again with a fresh beam until they have systematically threaded the protons around the entire machine. That could take from a few hours to a few days with a crew working around the clock. Then, the team will have to do the same for the beam in the other direction.

    The next challenge will be to get the beams in a stable orbit for several hours at a time. Only then can CERN contemplate ramping up the energy to 5 TeV and finally bringing the counter-rotating beams head on at a collision energy of 10 TeV.

    If luck is on their side, that should take place around the time of the official LHC inauguration on 21 October. In early 2009, the protons are set to collide at the full energy of 14 TeV.

    Mystery of mass

    Discoveries will come much later still. Although some exotic new particles, if they exist, could reveal their presence when the beams collide this year, it will likely take a year for researchers on the LHC's four experiments to understand their cathedral-scale detectors well enough to make a discovery.

    Finding the Higgs boson, which would solve the mystery of where mass comes from, could take two to three years.

    The LHC schedule has suffered several setbacks, including a delay in fitting the cryogenic plumbing for the liquid helium and a shorter interruption last March due to faulty magnets.

    But CERN is now on the home stretch. "It's been a long haul," says Evans. "We're finishing a marathon with a sprint."

    Quantum World - Learn more about a weird world in our comprehensive special report.

    Sunday, July 20, 2008

    Will t Large Hadron Collider Destroy the Earth?

    Skeptoid #109
    July 15, 2008
    Podcast transcript | Listen | Subscribe





    ..

    As you may have heard by now, some people have voiced concerns that particle collisions from the LHC will create tiny black holes. Black holes have such intense gravity that they consume everything around them, even light. And so,

    within a fraction of a second, this tiny black hole will consume the collider itself, France, Switzerland, and then the entire Earth, presumably followed shortly thereafter by our whole solar system.
    Clearly not a fear to be taken lightly.

    The best known opposition to the Large Hadron Collider comes in the form of a much publicized lawsuit, filed in Hawaii by two individuals, science writer Luis Sancho and retired nuclear safety officer Walter L. Wagner, against the US Department of Energy, Fermilab, CERN, the National Science Foundation and Does 1-100.

    The lawsuit presents affidavits from the plaintiffs and five other individuals, stating their opinion that dangerous black holes could be formed and seeking to block operation of the collider until these fears can be adequately studied.
    It seems a reasonable precaution, given how incredibly gigantic and powerful the LHC is, and how Biblical the scale of the destruction it might wreak.

    More...

    Aims of LHC - 2


    The Large Hadron Collider

    Our understanding of the Universe is about to change...

    The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is a gigantic scientific instrument near Geneva, where it spans the border between Switzerland and France about 100 m underground.

    It is a particle accelerator used by physicists to study the smallest known particles – the fundamental building blocks of all things. It will revolutionise our understanding, from the miniscule world deep within atoms to the vastness of the Universe.

    Two beams of subatomic particles called 'hadrons' – either protons or lead ions – will travel in opposite directions inside the circular accelerator, gaining energy with every lap. Physicists will use the LHC to recreate the conditions just after the Big Bang, by colliding the two beams head-on at very high energy. Teams of physicists from around the world will analyse the particles created in the collisions using special detectors in a number of experiments dedicated to the LHC.

    There are many theories as to what will result from these collisions, but what's for sure is that a brave new world of physics will emerge from the new accelerator, as knowledge in particle physics goes on to describe the workings of the Universe. For decades, the Standard Model of particle physics has served physicists well as a means of understanding the fundamental laws of Nature, but it does not tell the whole story.

    Only experimental data using the higher energies reached by the LHC can push knowledge forward, challenging those who seek confirmation of established knowledge, and those who dare to dream beyond the paradigm.

    Reference: Image

    Aims of LHC - 1

    When in operation, about seven thousand scientists from eighty countries will have access to the LHC, the largest national contingent of seven hundred being from the United States. Physicists hope to use the collider to test various grand unified theories and enhance their ability to answer the following questions:

    Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

    Distribution of CERN Users by Nation

    Standard Model of Elementary Particles

    Sub-atomic table
    The Standard Model (reference) is a theory devised to explain how sub-atomic particles interact with each other
    There are 16 particles that make up this model (12 matter particles and 4 force carrier particles). But they would have no mass if considered alone
    The Higgs boson explains why these particles have mass. Particles acquire their mass through interactions with an all-pervading field, called the Higgs field, which is carried by the Higgs boson.


    Reference

    Saturday, July 19, 2008

    Cern lab goes 'colder than space'

    By Paul Rincon
    Science reporter, BBC News

    LHC tunnel (M. Brice/Cern)
    Superconducting magnets are cooled down using liquid helium

    A vast physics experiment built in a tunnel below the French-Swiss border is fast becoming one of the coolest places in the Universe.

    The Large Hadron Collider is entering the final stages of being lowered to a temperature of 1.9 Kelvin (-271C; -456F) - colder than deep space.

    The LHC has thousands of magnets which will be maintained in this frigid condition using liquid helium.

    The magnets are arranged in a ring that runs for 27km through the giant tunnel.

    Once the LHC is operational, two particle beams - usually consisting of protons accelerated to high energies - will be fired down pipes running through the magnets.

    These beams will then travel in opposite directions around the main ring at close to the speed of light.

    At allotted points along the tunnel, the beams will cross paths, smashing into one another with cataclysmic force. Scientists hope to see new particles in the debris of these collisions, revealing fundamental new insights into the nature of the cosmos and how it came into being.

    The most powerful physics experiment ever built, the LHC will re-create the conditions just after the Big Bang.

    Currently, six out of the LHC's eight sectors are between 4.5 and 1.9 Kelvin, though all sectors of the machine have been down to 1.9 Kelvin at some stage over the last few months.

    By comparison, the temperature in remote regions of outer space is about 2.7 Kelvin (-270C; -454F).

    CMS detector at end of 2007 (M. Brice/Cern)
    The CMS detector will search for the Higgs boson - the so-called "God particle"

    Roberto Saban, the LHC's head of hardware commissioning, said that in order to obtain high magnetic fields without consuming too much power, the magnets were required to be "superconducting".

    This is the property, exhibited by some materials at very low temperatures, to channel electrical current with zero resistance and very little power loss.

    Helium exhibits spectacular properties at 2.2 Kelvin - becoming "superfluid". This allows it to conduct heat very rapidly, making it an extremely efficient refrigerant.

    No particle physics facility on this scale has ever operated at such low temperatures. But, so far, the hardware was performing as predicted, Roberto Saban explained.

    "We have a very systematic process for the commissioning of this machine, based on very carefully designed procedures prepared with experience we have gathered on prototypes."

    He added: "Our motto is: no short cuts? exchanging a single component which today is cold, is like bringing it back from the Moon. It takes about three to four weeks to warm it up. Then it takes one or two weeks to exchange. Then it needs three to six weeks to cool down again.

    "So, you see, it is three months if we make a mistake."

    Two sectors of the LHC are currently not cold enough for testing to proceed. Electronics that control the cryogenic systems in these sectors are being moved to an area where they will be better shielded against particles that shoot out of the machine during collisions.

    Closing the circle

    One sector of the ring is being run as if the LHC was operational and carrying a beam. This is so that crews can de-bug software and hardware and gain experience of running operating cycles.

    The LHC's magnets must also undergo electrical testing. Each sector of the machine contains about 200 electrical circuits. Each circuit may consist of as many as 154 magnets or as few as one.

    They are being tested for their ability to handle very high currents - up to 12,000 Amps .

    "We power each circuit, making sure it goes to its design current. But above all, we are verifying that all the protection systems around it - which are there to detect an eventual quench - are operating as expected," said Roberto Saban.

    A quench occurs when some part of the magnet starts to heat up, becoming resistant to electrical current. Engineers have built in a recovery system to detect these quenches before they affect the magnetic field bending particles around the ring and shut off the circulating beams.

    The machine's cool-down should take another two weeks to complete, provided no serious problems are found. Electrical testing of the magnets may take another couple of weeks.

    Before the LHC is "switched on" for the first time, the proton beams have to be boosted to high energies in a chain of particle accelerators called the injectors.

    Once the machine is cold, operators will inject beams into the main ring, threading them through each independent sector of the LHC until they close the circle.

    A timing, or synchronisation, system is used to ensure each of these sectors behaves as if they were a single machine.

    When the LHC is switched on it will operate at an energy of five trillion electron-volts. It will then be shut down for the winter, so that the magnets can be "trained" to handle a beam run at seven trillion electron-volts.

    Paul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

    About LHC - 2

    Brief Description of the LHC.

    Energising the quest for 'big theory'
    By Paul Rincon

    BBC News science reporter, Geneva

    Cern's Atlas detector will search for the elusive "God particle" (Image: Cern/Maximilien Brice)

    "We are at a point where experiments must guide us, we cannot make progress without them," explains Jim Virdee, a particle physicist at Imperial College London.

    "We must wait for the data to speak."

    Over a coffee in the lobby of building 40 at Cern, the sprawling experimental facility situated on the Swiss-French border, Professor Virdee says physics has reached a critical juncture.

    In the 1970s, the theory known as the Standard Model was considered a triumph of theoretical physics, incorporating all that was then known about the interactions of sub-atomic particles.

    Today it is regarded as incomplete, a mere stepping stone to something else.

    The Standard Model cannot explain the best known of the so-called four fundamental forces: gravity; and it describes only ordinary matter, which makes up but a small part of the total Universe.

    The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Cern (The European Centre for Nuclear Research) is costing some 3bn Swiss francs (1.9bn euros; £1.3bn), which is paid for by contributions from Cern's member countries (including the UK) with support from international partners such as the US, Japan, China and India.

    It should reinvigorate physics' biggest endeavour: a grand theory to describe all physical phenomena in nature.

    The Large Hadron Collider takes shape

    About 100m below us, in a tunnel that runs in a ring for 27km (17 miles), the LHC is being assembled
    from its constituent parts like a vast, impossibly complex Meccano set.

    When it is switched on for a pilot run in summer 2007,

    this huge physics experiment will collide two beams of particles head-on at super-fast speeds, recreating the conditions in the Universe moments after the Big Bang.

    The beam collisions should create showers of new particles, revealing new physics beyond the Standard Model. In order for that to happen, the LHC needs to reach much higher energies than previous colliders.

    Sealed vacuum

    The particle beams, composed of either protons or lead ions, will be created in Cern's existing chain of particle accelerators and then injected into the LHC. Here they will receive an additional electrical impulse to boost them up to their final energy; the equivalent of seven trillion volts.

    Some 1,232 "dipole magnets" will carry these high energy beams through their interior and bend them around the LHC.

    Each one undergoes a rigorous quality test before it can be lowered into the tunnel. At the Cern site known as SM18, Dr Mike Lamont, from Cern's beam operations group, shows us round the hangar-like facility where the magnets are put through their paces, 12 at a time.

    The tests are run at 1.9 Kelvin (-271C), the eventual operating temperature of the LHC. This is just a shade above "absolute zero" and colder than the vacuum of outer space. The magnets are cooled to this ultra-low temperature by bathing them in liquid helium.

    The magnets undergo thorough testing before they are lowered into the tunnel

    When helium is cooled to 2.17 Kelvin, it exhibits remarkable properties. In this "superfluid" state, it flows with almost zero viscosity and an unusually high thermal conductivity. This makes it ideal for cooling and stabilising a large superconducting system like the one at the LHC.

    In 2007, Mike Lamont will be one of the machine co-ordinators "driving" the LHC: "It's a huge challenge," he says. "The magnets are one thing, but then you've got 27km of instrumentation and controls. Everything's got to be synchronised incredibly well."

    At four points around the LHC ring, the two beams cross each other, causing some of the particles to collide head-on. Near each of the crossing points will sit a detector, an experiment the size of a mansion, to capture and measure new particles produced in the collisions.

    Simulation of Higgs decay, Cern
    A simulation shows what a Higgs signature might look like
    The LHC's four detectors are named LHCb, Alice, Atlas and the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS). Each is worked on by a dedicated team of physicists.

    While LHCb and Alice are designed to investigate specific physical phenomena, Atlas and CMS are designated "general purpose" detectors.

    They will both aim to identify the elusive Higgs boson (known as the "God particle" because of its importance to the Standard Model), look for so-called supersymmetric particles and seek out the existence of extra dimensions.

    As such,

    the scientists working on Atlas will to some extent be competing with those on CMS. Both teams aim to be first to find the Higgs, leaving the other to "verify" their discovery
    (a scientific euphemism, one suspects, for "eat humble pie").

    Mass giver

    The Higgs boson explains why all other particles have mass. According to the theory, particles acquire their mass through interactions with an all-pervading field, called the Higgs field, which is carried by the Higgs boson.

    At Point One in Switzerland, we don hard hats, squeeze into a lift with the construction workers and descend into the enormous cavern that will house Atlas, the bigger of the two general purpose detectors.

    The modules that make up this giant experiment have been built separately in laboratories around the world and transported to Cern for assembly.

    "The same happens with big aircraft such as the Airbus A380," observes Dr Alan Barr, a physicist at University College London and Atlas team member. "They make all the bits separately, bring them together and it all fits.

    "The thing is, we only ever build one," comments Cern scientist and Atlas team member Dr Pippa Wells. "We don't make one Atlas, then another, and find out we know what we're doing by the fifth."

    "We've got one shot, it's got to work first time," says Alan Barr.

    Testing time

    Over the border at Cessy in France, the CMS team will soon begin testing individual "slices" of its experiment to see whether each can detect cosmic rays from space.

    Much of the assembly of the CMS is taking place above ground. Large elements will then be lowered by crane into the underground cavern built to house it. This process will take about six months.

    View from the ground of a CMS barrel station, BBC/Paul Rincon
    Individual slices of the CMS will be tested above ground
    A wrangle over the supply of crystals lining the detector's electromagnetic calorimeter (which measures the energies of particles produced in collisions) has now been resolved. But part of this component won't be ready for installation in CMS by the LHC's pilot run in 2007.

    However, says team member Jim Virdee, the calorimeter will be complete and installed in the CMS by April 2008, ready for the start of the LHC's main science run. The delay won't put the CMS at a disadvantage in the race to find the Higgs, he adds, since

    over a year's worth of data will be needed to announce a discovery.

    Cern's chief theorist Professor John Ellis even thinks

    finding the Higgs could shed light on another great mystery in physics: dark energy.

    Dark discovery

    In 1998, two teams studying supernovae showed that this dark energy is accelerating the expansion of the Universe. Subsequent work revealed that dark energy may make up about 70% of the Universe, but the best theories could not explain it.

    According to John Ellis, however,

    the Higgs field is the perfect candidate for the source of dark energy.

    "The Higgs mechanism fills all of space with a field. Unlike the gravitational field, which is strong around the Sun and the centre of the galaxy, the Higgs field would have essentially the same value everywhere,"
    he explains.

    "It would give you dark energy, in the sense that dark energy is energy density in empty space a long way away from any matter."

    There's just a small problem with the idea, says John Ellis: it gives 120 orders of magnitude too much dark energy.

    "If we find the Higgs, it would corroborate this whole theory that there's this Higgs field sitting throughout the Universe providing dark energy. Then we can get on to the next question which is why it has the value it does."

    Such a breakthrough would energise debate on a "unified theory" to describe all natural phenomena. Discoveries such as supersymmetry may also bridge gaps between experimental evidence and string theory, one attempt at building a grand scheme.

    The LHC might even reveal something completely unexpected about the workings of our Universe. And that, say physicists, might be even more satisfying.

    Sub-atomic table
    The Standard Model is a theory devised to explain how sub-atomic particles interact with each other
    There are 16 particles that make up this model (12 matter particles and 4 force carrier particles). But they would have no mass if considered alone
    The Higgs boson explains why these particles have mass. Particles acquire their mass through interactions with an all-pervading field, called the Higgs field, which is carried by the Higgs boson.